Whether a person agrees or disagrees with "non-heterosexual" lifestyles is not relevant when it comes to the processes of our government. In our modern world we are constantly bombarded with twisted values and bigoted debates regarding race, gender, sexuality and immigration. Someone who would argue that any minority in the four areas listed before should be able to be permitted from employment or basic rights due to their minority status is absolutely against the human condition. You can not sit here and argue that someone should not be able to hire a black, transgender female, based on those aspects of her and nothing more. If you are hiring an individual it should be on the context of their merit or work ethics and nothing more. Sadly, this broken world does not always see each individual human and their expression and background as absolutely precious. That must change, even in our rural Nebraska home.
This is a link to a petition that has been started for the LB485 Bill (a bill that has been written to ensure employment equality to all genders and sexual orientation Nebraskans)
https://secure3.convio.net/hrc/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=1843

I may get a lot of hate for this comment, but oh well. If the owner of a company does not want a black transgender "female" representing their company, then they shouldn't hire them. I don't care about their work ethic, experience, or things like that. If the owner feels that being a transgender is immoral, then why would they want so embody who is immoral working for them, and representing the company. I wouldn't want to hire a transgender. I know most people are against me on this, but I just think its wrong to hire someone that will represent your company in a bad way. I'm not saying that they are always bad people, but what they have done with their life should be looked at and used to hire or fire someone.
ReplyDelete